M55
Should we have a Group Validation button?
December 31 2014
Comments
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Obviously it would need the option to be kept private
-
aussian43
11 years ago
Can't the existing validation function serve that purpose? Or are you talking about some sort of feedback function, say a few check boxes: Turned up on time, Worth Meeting, Matched Profile, etc? Any sort of negative feedback is open to abuse. I can see vindictive people creating multiple accounts to be nasty. And many men on the site will end up with none because they have not had any luck with interacting with one of the few ladies on here.
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Suppose the aim was to try to provide a guide to those members who are seriously looking to meet for group or more than one on one...........We've seen lots of thread saying that no shows are very annoying to say the least.......while there a plenty of legitimate reasons for a no show it still is very disconcerting if it occurs......Why do these people illegitimately not show up....Are they or their circumstances not as they promote themselves to be?....Do they fantasise but that's it and do not have the confidence to show up....there could be lots of reasons why these members illegitimately not turn up..... there are a very high percentage of members looking for group etc......Why not a private validation specifically for it?....you are comfortable telling?.at way its your choice to retain those and privately release those validations to interested parties
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Who is the group giving the validations?
-
RHP User
11 years ago
I am confused...Are you talking about parties.Is that what you mean by a group.Where would you post a tick or flick?...if it's just about people not turning up with no excuse or what you consider a poor excuse.that"s life..and while it may be rude behaviour ,the excuse may have been valid or b the reality may have been embarrassing ,eg Dear SA.unfotunately I have a bad case of diarrhoea/ vomiting/ ,my budgie passed away, my cat ate a rat and vomited all over me ,now my best dress is ruined,my BFF's boyfriend just dumped her and she needs me..Etc...why would you tell a perfect stranger any of this...As I said on another thread..It's all about timing and inclination..Gotta have both xxFreya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
We hear all the time that - well have to say it - guys - do not turn up to group sex invitations, or they turn up and then do not feel like performing in front of others......the aim of the Group Sex validation is to use it as a tool to show authenticity, but given its nature would need to have a private function..... other group sex participants who witnessed the member appropriately joining in on group fun could provide that member a group sex validation that the member indeed participated.......... So when the member was being considered for a group sex scenario he/she could provide access to their group sex validation.... It could be an extra self authentication process.........
-
RHP User
11 years ago
no argument that there are many valid reasons not to show up......no argument at all.....however its apparent in many posts that a reasonable percentage of these no shows may not have valid reasons, or are multiple offenders......or turn up and do not feel comfortable performing or turn up and act inappropriately.........these are some of the negatives involved in this lifestyle - unpredictability. As a way to avoid this, members could post a Group Sex Validation on a fellow participants - privately....... eg..So Sally has group sex with roger mick bill simon Anthony trevor.....Samuel acts in appropriately and offends others, Kevin didn't even call to say hes unavailable......So Sally wanting a GB rang Doug. Doug turns up at the last minute dressed well clean affable nice guy - he shines like a diamond, is the life of the party, and even brings tea and scones for later..... Doug then gets a group sex validation from Sally.....(but not for the scones as they were pumpkin based) Doug accepts his new Group Sex Validation and retains it privately, then issues access to Michelle later that week.... Samuel gets a few negative Group Sex Validations......he thinks hes done nothing wrong and deletes them without anyone ever knowing..... Sally gets a number of validations - wants only one so deletes the others and retains her one Group sex validation privately, for future use.. An extra filter for us authentic members.......
-
RHP User
11 years ago
I suppose it would save me asking for three referees. But really for a group validation to be worthwhile you would have to have a performance rating. I mean anyone can turn up to a gang bang, But did they do their part? That is the real question.
-
RHP User
11 years ago
So the individual gets the validation s to use or not.But that function exists already,you just need to word it accordingly btw SA why not include kudos for the scones?..my Auntie Flo's were orgasmic 😜xxFreya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
** smiles & chuckles ** I like it............naturally this being a private facility the receiving member would have their choice to accept or delete the validation......what about a sliding scale on the qualities we like to see in our fellow particpants....PolitePromptPerformer
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Well wise Freya, must admit ive never experienced scones like that - perhaps cookies :-) Ahhh but the validation process we have now is public when used and is general in nature...... Authentic group sex participants have the ongoing issue of attendance from new players...Privacy - Group Sex validations would work best if private, and given the purpose specifically for Group Sex verification the large percentage of us already participating could use the Group Sex validation to maximise attendance to our playtime / party(s)............
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Just to be devil's advocate,are you going to have a roll call when people walk in the door??..." Oh hello Mr.BiggusDickus,nice to see you,and you too LilMissCumBunny...here are you feedback forms and your name tags...er sorry we had to use super glue to make sure in a heated moment they don't peel off "😜xxFreya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
ha, MrBiggestDickus was sadly rejected before he arrived, after last time he had been asked to clean his teeth but was refusing.... littlemscumbunny was allowed straight in, she was clean, prompt and loved performing like the rest of the attendees......LittleMscum bunny again received a Group Sex Validation, this time it was worded very nicely, she could see the potential so she kept hers for later use.......
-
RHP User
11 years ago
In a group situation how will people know or remember their profile names..or indeed who did what to whom xx Freya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
People ask each other. Just like when you go to a meet and greet....
-
RHP User
11 years ago
and we'll have more buttons than a NASA launchpad lol - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
11 years ago
the ones they wanted to....
-
aussian43
11 years ago
Quoting 'Freya79' your name tags...er sorry we had to use super glue to make sure in a heated moment they don't peel off "😜xxFreya Just use a permanent marker on their butts. ;) Any system would be open to abuse. It would be a simple matter to create accounts and give yourself wondrous feedback. Even if you limited it to paying members, some would consider it a cheap price.
-
RHP User
11 years ago
And a failure to launch crisis😱xxFreya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Quoting 'sir_stir' and we'll have more buttons than a NASA launchpad lol - Posted from rhpmobile Q: Shuttle Columbias captain Christa McAuliffe's last words were? A: "What's this button do?" First learn how to use your system then maximise it.....
-
RHP User
11 years ago
but maximising is about efficiency not duplication.... But magnificent advice though re:learning to use the existing system; which means you'll agree that we don't need a group validation button 😊 - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
11 years ago
yes mate maximising functionality ensures efficiency so long as one understands whats at his fingertips... The previous posts went over the difference between the current validation button and one just for Group Sex participants.....namely a privacy function to the Group Sex validation one received. You'd agree im sure - that there is continuous annoyance posted at the old "No Show".....check out some current threads to hear the complaints.....dare I draw a distinction between one on one coffee dates and an invitation to a group sex activity...im sure someone would have stats but it really seems Group Sex activities suffer more no shows or, show ups but can not perform, or act inappropriately when they do show up...Ive seen it first hand a few times... For people into Group regularly an extra filter would save lots of wasted time which no one has these days....
-
MsJonesy
11 years ago
I see what you are trying to achieve... but I ain't got the time for that. I've got a few better things to do with my time
-
RHP User
11 years ago
maximising the existing validation process is a more viable option in my mind as it also makes people think about their validation before sending it.... However.... Even a validated person can still do a no show....as even the existing validation option here is ultimately flawed by allowing the receiver to approve or reject it...which even that mode for fixing it would open the potential for those with bitterness to manipulate the validation option... The thing is no process is going to be infallible....my view is simply whenever you're dealing with other living beings that you cannot control you're never going to have a perfect hit vs miss ratio.... What I believe is its better to manage the manageable which is our own expectations than what it is to try to control other people's actions.....and by doing this we avoid the disappointment train altogether. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
11 years ago
how do you rate first timers who just want to have a look and maybe not participate right away? That is often a stepping stone to people getting more involved as they get more confidence. If you are going to take away that confidence before they even have it then what is the point, you aren't going to attract more blood telling them they are duds because they didn't participate and as far as I am aware, many groups are happy for people to come along with no pressure to perform. And, whose standards of performance are we measuring by?
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Quoting 'sir_stir' maximising the existing validation process is a more viable option in my mind as it also makes people think about their validation before sending it.... However.... Even a validated person can still do a no show....as even the existing validation option here is ultimately flawed by allowing the receiver to approve or reject it...which even that mode for fixing it would open the potential for those with bitterness to manipulate the validation option... The thing is no process is going to be infallible....my view is simply whenever you're dealing with other living beings that you cannot control you're never going to have a perfect hit vs miss ratio.... What I believe is its better to manage the manageable which is our own expectations than what it is to try to control other people's actions.....and by doing this we avoid the disappointment train altogether. - Posted from rhpmobile Stirry, Change is the law of life, innovation is the driver of every economy on the globe, motivation to innovate is about improvement not maintaining the status quo..
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Quoting 'ralf74' how do you rate first timers who just want to have a look and maybe not participate right away? That is often a stepping stone to people getting more involved as they get more confidence. If you are going to take away that confidence before they even have it then what is the point, you aren't going to attract more blood telling them they are duds because they didn't participate and as far as I am aware, many groups are happy for people to come along with no pressure to perform. And, whose standards of performance are we measuring by? Since the thread is about smarter tools to minimise illegitimate no shows primarily, the improvement is about making RHP more user friendly. In the scenario posed above the individual(s) turned up, they communicated their preferences as we all should and indicated they prefer to no participate. We've all been newbies fairness is about equality.
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Quoting 'SensualAries' Quoting 'ralf74' how do you rate first timers who just want to have a look and maybe not participate right away? That is often a stepping stone to people getting more involved as they get more confidence. If you are going to take away that confidence before they even have it then what is the point, you aren't going to attract more blood telling them they are duds because they didn't participate and as far as I am aware, many groups are happy for people to come along with no pressure to perform. And, whose standards of performance are we measuring by? Since the thread is about smarter tools to minimise illegitimate no shows primarily, the improvement is about making RHP more user friendly. In the scenario posed above the individual(s) turned up, they communicated their preferences as we all should and indicated they prefer to no participate. We've all been newbies fairness is about equality. *** Newbies should be welcomed with open arms again we've all been there.....The newbie would have the benefit of receiving a Group Sex validation from the host. This would make them feel a lot more comfortable. Thye can better judge if the host is indeed legitimate. Good post Ralf
-
RHP User
11 years ago
change must occur from within...not from external sources.. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
Seachange73
11 years ago
Quoting 'SensualAries' We hear all the time that - well have to say it - guys - do not turn up to group sex invitations, or they turn up and then do not feel like performing in front of others......the aim of the Group Sex validation is to use it as a tool to show authenticity, but given its nature would need to have a private function..... other group sex participants who witnessed the member appropriately joining in on group fun could provide that member a group sex validation that the member indeed participated.......... So when the member was being considered for a group sex scenario he/she could provide access to their group sex validation.... It could be an extra self authentication process......... Whoa!!!! I can see the tool totally open to abuse. The reasoning you have put up, ideal as it seems to promote your needs for a successful 'group sex meet' is so fraught from the start and easily used as a bullying, ostracizing and shaming tool. You might as well put up a compulsory drooping puss-filled cock or vagina (sorry for the visuals) to each of these 'no-shows' to deter any other members from engaging with them because you were pissed off of the non-show, non-performance. Or wait - lousy fuck performance....... . Anyway, consistent with the existing rhp validation process, why would anybody with half a brain and horny as fuck accept this 'scarlet letter' on their profile. counter productive to their presence here on rhp. RHP may lose half their membership on this functio alone. I can not justify the need, to serve the few, for the life of me, Meh. Anyway, setting up a sex performance governance model and maintaining it is near impossible for many reason. Where to start? . We all know that our moods can change on the day of play depending on any preceding events (work stress, personal issues, health issues, etc) and may not be able to participate as other people want. Bloody hell, lucky if they even showed up much less perform. Now unless they are trained performing monkeys, do you really think they should be forced to pound away to satisfy your needs and to your level of satisfaction. If they refuse to perform, do they deserve the hammering you wish to impose on him? 20 self-imposed lashes? If they end up being a lousy fuck, do they get battered as well as have a gimp ball shoved up their mouth until the group say they are ok to go? Is there a quarantine corner where they are banned to play until they have whipped themselves in repentance, crawl on their knees on tack laiden floors, and beg for the group's gods and goddesses forgiveness? Soo complicated....Seems quite unfair in my opinion and quite vindictive. Your post, in my opinion reflects your disappointment and frustration on no shows. Understandably frustrating. We all can relate. If they do not show up, do what we single adult people here do... MOVE ON.... Rant over.
-
RHP User
11 years ago
I can't really disagree with that 👍👍 - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
11 years ago
How would you rate a starfish?..,some may enjoy pleasuring the little fish.some may require more animation..And what of Mr Not So Well Endowed..what if his seven inches was really only five?...will you whip out the measuring stick at the door?...What about the shy ones..what about the ones who aren't in to anyone there.?.So many variables,subjective opinions and potential for,pouting...gee he got his end away ,but what about mine? XxFreya
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Yep SA... change must occur from within...not from external sources.. - Posted from rhpmobile ==================================== A curious metaphor to use Stirry, since the fuller context is that "Change must come from within for significant change can be bought about. So thanks for backing up my position mate - :-)))))))😃😃😃😃😃 SA😃😃😃😃😃
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Oh dear you are soo flippn sexy. Notwithstanding the aforementioned you are also v naughty....now get those legs off my thread so I may concentrate........ 1. You missed highlighting the words "private function" in my post quoted.. So first two paragraphs irrelevant. 2. Did I say you're sizzling when ur worked up - soooooo hottt!! 3. Sexiest LO Please REFER to OP and first page of Thread. Not a GS governance model in fact princess you hot thing you are first to mention. 4. My dear LO please refer to the OP. Thread based on common GS complaints. Sorry my sweet no transference here. I just say it like it is. 5. I think I'm in love. 6. Please refer to ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING thread. Last time I was in love it lasted a whole week! 7. PM me :-) SAxxxxxx
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Dearie Lorde me ms wise owl - well at least that was my perception up until your last post.... We all should be unequivocally aware not to ever disturb nature, why would you want to ever think to do that to a starfish. That is exactly why future generations will not be afforded the same experiences as their forebearers. 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 xxSA
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Please step forward.... (Exception granted to LO)
-
RHP User
11 years ago
Are you out of negative mode yet?.....
-
RHP User
11 years ago
you wish jelly fish :) And by negative you clearly mean "real" but I can live with your mutated form 😊 - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
11 years ago
** yawns **
-
Seachange73
11 years ago
Lol. You are incorrigible. Sigh. Lol.
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 15100 Comments: 88201
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1416 Comments: 10250
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2520 Comments: 11712
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2503 Comments: 9774
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 998 Comments: 5096
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1302 Comments: 5773
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 780 Comments: 1985
-
LGBT
Topics: 170 Comments: 869
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share